Saint Lucia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Saint Lucia
51.94 million current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
48.52 million current US$
in 2020
Saint Lucia rank
131st
Zimbabwe rank
132nd

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Saint Lucia
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Saint Lucia currently reports 51.94 million current US$ against 48.52 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 3.42 million current US$.

That makes Saint Lucia's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Saint Lucia ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Saint Lucia averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Saint Lucia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 0 current US$ 138.50 million current US$ 138.50 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 49.60 million current US$ 129.53 million current US$ 79.94 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 5.11 million current US$ 136.81 million current US$ 131.71 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 51.94 million current US$ 48.52 million current US$ 3.42 million current US$ Saint Lucia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Saint Lucia or Zimbabwe?
Saint Lucia, at 51.94 million current US$ against 48.52 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe?
3.42 million current US$, with Saint Lucia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Saint Lucia and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Saint Lucia ranks 131st and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Saint Lucia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/st-lucia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/st-lucia/zimbabwe/">Saint Lucia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed