Philippines vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Philippines
2.04 billion current US$
in 2020
South Africa
2.00 billion current US$
in 2020
Philippines rank
58th
South Africa rank
59th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Philippines
  • South Africa
02.0B4.0B6.0B8.0B199520072020

How they compare

Philippines currently reports 2.04 billion current US$ against 2.00 billion current US$ in South Africa, a difference of 38.96 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Philippines ranks 58th and South Africa ranks 59th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Philippines averaged higher in 1 and South Africa in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Philippines South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1.34 billion current US$ 2.36 billion current US$ 1.02 billion current US$ South Africa
2000s 2.15 billion current US$ 5.18 billion current US$ 3.03 billion current US$ South Africa
2010s 4.88 billion current US$ 7.33 billion current US$ 2.45 billion current US$ South Africa
2020s 2.04 billion current US$ 2.00 billion current US$ 38.96 million current US$ Philippines

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Philippines or South Africa?
Philippines, at 2.04 billion current US$ against 2.00 billion current US$ in South Africa as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Philippines and South Africa?
38.96 million current US$, with Philippines ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Philippines and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Philippines and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Philippines ranks 58th and South Africa ranks 59th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Philippines vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/philippines/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/philippines/south-africa/">Philippines vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed