New Zealand vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

New Zealand
46.86 billion current US$
in 2020
Sweden
33.83 billion current US$
in 2020
New Zealand rank
7th
Sweden rank
9th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • New Zealand
  • Sweden
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B199520072020

How they compare

New Zealand currently reports 46.86 billion current US$ against 33.83 billion current US$ in Sweden, a difference of 13.03 billion current US$.

That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.4 times Sweden's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Sweden ahead.

New Zealand ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 9th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, New Zealand averaged higher in 1 and Sweden in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade New Zealand Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 1.64 billion current US$ 3.37 billion current US$ 1.72 billion current US$ Sweden
2000s 3.67 billion current US$ 5.93 billion current US$ 2.26 billion current US$ Sweden
2010s 10.34 billion current US$ 27.93 billion current US$ 17.60 billion current US$ Sweden
2020s 46.86 billion current US$ 33.83 billion current US$ 13.03 billion current US$ New Zealand

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, New Zealand or Sweden?
New Zealand, at 46.86 billion current US$ against 33.83 billion current US$ in Sweden as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between New Zealand and Sweden?
13.03 billion current US$, with New Zealand ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do New Zealand and Sweden rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
New Zealand ranks 7th and Sweden ranks 9th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

New Zealand vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/new-zealand/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/new-zealand/sweden/">New Zealand vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed