Namibia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Namibia
113.95 million current US$
in 2020
Trinidad and Tobago
111.01 million current US$
in 2020
Namibia rank
124th
Trinidad and Tobago rank
125th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Namibia
  • Trinidad and Tobago
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199520072020

How they compare

Namibia currently reports 113.95 million current US$ against 111.01 million current US$ in Trinidad and Tobago, a difference of 2.94 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Namibia ranks 124th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 125th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Namibia averaged higher in 3 and Trinidad and Tobago in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Namibia Trinidad and Tobago Difference Ahead
1990s 1.62 billion current US$ 120.32 million current US$ 1.50 billion current US$ Namibia
2000s 280.61 million current US$ 239.32 million current US$ 41.29 million current US$ Namibia
2010s 333.39 million current US$ 514.24 million current US$ 180.85 million current US$ Trinidad and Tobago
2020s 113.95 million current US$ 111.01 million current US$ 2.94 million current US$ Namibia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Namibia or Trinidad and Tobago?
Namibia, at 113.95 million current US$ against 111.01 million current US$ in Trinidad and Tobago as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago?
2.94 million current US$, with Namibia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Namibia and Trinidad and Tobago rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Namibia ranks 124th and Trinidad and Tobago ranks 125th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Namibia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/namibia/trinidad-and-tobago/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/namibia/trinidad-and-tobago/">Namibia vs Trinidad and Tobago: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed