Montenegro vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Montenegro
132.33 million current US$
in 2020
Namibia
113.95 million current US$
in 2020
Montenegro rank
122nd
Namibia rank
124th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Montenegro
  • Namibia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199520072020

How they compare

Montenegro currently reports 132.33 million current US$ against 113.95 million current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 18.38 million current US$.

That makes Montenegro's figure about 1.2 times Namibia's.

Across all 14 years both countries report, Montenegro has been ahead every year.

Montenegro ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 124th of 149 countries.

Montenegro has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Montenegro Namibia Difference Ahead
2000s 566.31 million current US$ 375.66 million current US$ 190.65 million current US$ Montenegro
2010s 733.24 million current US$ 333.39 million current US$ 399.85 million current US$ Montenegro
2020s 132.33 million current US$ 113.95 million current US$ 18.38 million current US$ Montenegro

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Montenegro or Namibia?
Montenegro, at 132.33 million current US$ against 113.95 million current US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Montenegro and Namibia?
18.38 million current US$, with Montenegro ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Montenegro and Namibia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Montenegro and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Montenegro ranks 122nd and Namibia ranks 124th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Montenegro vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/montenegro/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/montenegro/namibia/">Montenegro vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed