Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Mongolia
36.02 million current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
48.52 million current US$
in 2020
Mongolia rank
135th
Zimbabwe rank
132nd

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Mongolia
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 48.52 million current US$ against 36.02 million current US$ in Mongolia, a difference of 12.50 million current US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.3 times Mongolia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Mongolia ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mongolia averaged higher in 2 and Zimbabwe in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mongolia Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 24.70 million current US$ 138.50 million current US$ 113.80 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 142.03 million current US$ 129.53 million current US$ 12.50 million current US$ Mongolia
2010s 253.19 million current US$ 136.81 million current US$ 116.37 million current US$ Mongolia
2020s 36.02 million current US$ 48.52 million current US$ 12.50 million current US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Mongolia or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 48.52 million current US$ against 36.02 million current US$ in Mongolia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
12.50 million current US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mongolia and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mongolia and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Mongolia ranks 135th and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/mongolia/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/mongolia/zimbabwe/">Mongolia vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed