Mauritius vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Mauritius
126.94 million current US$
in 2020
Namibia
113.95 million current US$
in 2020
Mauritius rank
123rd
Namibia rank
124th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Mauritius
  • Namibia
0500.0M1.0B1.5B2.0B199520072020

How they compare

Mauritius currently reports 126.94 million current US$ against 113.95 million current US$ in Namibia, a difference of 12.99 million current US$.

That makes Mauritius's figure about 1.1 times Namibia's.

The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Namibia ahead.

Mauritius ranks 123rd and Namibia ranks 124th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 2 and Namibia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Mauritius Namibia Difference Ahead
1990s 165.51 million current US$ 1.62 billion current US$ 1.45 billion current US$ Namibia
2000s 266.32 million current US$ 280.61 million current US$ 14.29 million current US$ Namibia
2010s 412.85 million current US$ 333.39 million current US$ 79.46 million current US$ Mauritius
2020s 126.94 million current US$ 113.95 million current US$ 12.99 million current US$ Mauritius

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Mauritius or Namibia?
Mauritius, at 126.94 million current US$ against 113.95 million current US$ in Namibia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Mauritius and Namibia?
12.99 million current US$, with Mauritius ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Mauritius ranks 123rd and Namibia ranks 124th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Mauritius vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 21 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/mauritius/namibia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/mauritius/namibia/">Mauritius vs Namibia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed