Malawi vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Malawi
25.73 million current US$
in 2020
Suriname
13.97 million current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
136th
Suriname rank
138th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Malawi
  • Suriname
20.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 25.73 million current US$ against 13.97 million current US$ in Suriname, a difference of 11.76 million current US$.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.8 times Suriname's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Suriname ahead.

Malawi ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 138th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Malawi averaged higher in 1 and Suriname in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Suriname Difference Ahead
1990s 22.35 million current US$ 31.61 million current US$ 9.26 million current US$ Suriname
2000s 35.29 million current US$ 43.08 million current US$ 7.79 million current US$ Suriname
2010s 29.85 million current US$ 57.56 million current US$ 27.72 million current US$ Suriname
2020s 25.73 million current US$ 13.97 million current US$ 11.76 million current US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Malawi or Suriname?
Malawi, at 25.73 million current US$ against 13.97 million current US$ in Suriname as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Malawi and Suriname?
11.76 million current US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Suriname?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malawi and Suriname rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Malawi ranks 136th and Suriname ranks 138th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 03 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/malawi/suriname/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/malawi/suriname/">Malawi vs Suriname: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed