Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Malawi
25.73 million current US$
in 2020
Sao Tome and Principe
19.77 million current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
136th
Sao Tome and Principe rank
137th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Malawi
  • Sao Tome and Principe
020.0M40.0M60.0M199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 25.73 million current US$ against 19.77 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe, a difference of 5.96 million current US$.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.3 times Sao Tome and Principe's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malawi has been ahead every year.

Malawi ranks 136th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 149 countries.

Malawi has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Sao Tome and Principe Difference Ahead
1990s 22.35 million current US$ 10.26 million current US$ 12.09 million current US$ Malawi
2000s 35.29 million current US$ 1.79 million current US$ 33.50 million current US$ Malawi
2010s 29.85 million current US$ 11.69 million current US$ 18.16 million current US$ Malawi
2020s 25.73 million current US$ 19.77 million current US$ 5.96 million current US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Malawi or Sao Tome and Principe?
Malawi, at 25.73 million current US$ against 19.77 million current US$ in Sao Tome and Principe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe?
5.96 million current US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malawi and Sao Tome and Principe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Malawi ranks 136th and Sao Tome and Principe ranks 137th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/malawi/sao-tome-and-principe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/malawi/sao-tome-and-principe/">Malawi vs Sao Tome and Principe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed