Malawi vs Mongolia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Malawi
25.73 million current US$
in 2020
Mongolia
36.02 million current US$
in 2020
Malawi rank
136th
Mongolia rank
135th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Malawi
  • Mongolia
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M199520072020

How they compare

Mongolia currently reports 36.02 million current US$ against 25.73 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 10.29 million current US$.

That makes Mongolia's figure about 1.4 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Mongolia ahead.

Malawi ranks 136th and Mongolia ranks 135th of 149 countries.

Mongolia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malawi Mongolia Difference Ahead
1990s 22.35 million current US$ 24.70 million current US$ 2.35 million current US$ Mongolia
2000s 35.29 million current US$ 142.03 million current US$ 106.74 million current US$ Mongolia
2010s 29.85 million current US$ 253.19 million current US$ 223.34 million current US$ Mongolia
2020s 25.73 million current US$ 36.02 million current US$ 10.29 million current US$ Mongolia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Malawi or Mongolia?
Mongolia, at 36.02 million current US$ against 25.73 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Malawi and Mongolia?
10.29 million current US$, with Mongolia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malawi and Mongolia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malawi and Mongolia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Malawi ranks 136th and Mongolia ranks 135th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malawi vs Mongolia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 24 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/malawi/mongolia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/malawi/mongolia/">Malawi vs Mongolia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed