Lithuania vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Lithuania
3.95 billion current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
4.38 billion current US$
in 2020
Lithuania rank
37th
Papua New Guinea rank
35th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Lithuania
  • Papua New Guinea
01.0B2.0B3.0B4.0B199520072020

How they compare

Papua New Guinea currently reports 4.38 billion current US$ against 3.95 billion current US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 429.05 million current US$.

That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Papua New Guinea ahead.

Lithuania ranks 37th and Papua New Guinea ranks 35th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 2 and Papua New Guinea in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lithuania Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 285.39 million current US$ 2.53 billion current US$ 2.24 billion current US$ Papua New Guinea
2000s 1.81 billion current US$ 1.12 billion current US$ 693.92 million current US$ Lithuania
2010s 3.64 billion current US$ 1.19 billion current US$ 2.45 billion current US$ Lithuania
2020s 3.95 billion current US$ 4.38 billion current US$ 429.05 million current US$ Papua New Guinea

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Lithuania or Papua New Guinea?
Papua New Guinea, at 4.38 billion current US$ against 3.95 billion current US$ in Lithuania as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Lithuania and Papua New Guinea?
429.05 million current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Lithuania and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Lithuania ranks 37th and Papua New Guinea ranks 35th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lithuania vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/lithuania/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/lithuania/papua-new-guinea/">Lithuania vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed