Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Lesotho
56.94 million current US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
48.52 million current US$
in 2020
Lesotho rank
129th
Zimbabwe rank
132nd

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Lesotho
  • Zimbabwe
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 56.94 million current US$ against 48.52 million current US$ in Zimbabwe, a difference of 8.42 million current US$.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.2 times Zimbabwe's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Zimbabwe ahead.

Lesotho ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Lesotho Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 7.07 million current US$ 138.50 million current US$ 131.43 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 38.08 million current US$ 129.53 million current US$ 91.45 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 44.04 million current US$ 136.81 million current US$ 92.77 million current US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 56.94 million current US$ 48.52 million current US$ 8.42 million current US$ Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Lesotho or Zimbabwe?
Lesotho, at 56.94 million current US$ against 48.52 million current US$ in Zimbabwe as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
8.42 million current US$, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Lesotho and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Lesotho ranks 129th and Zimbabwe ranks 132nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 27 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/lesotho/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/lesotho/zimbabwe/">Lesotho vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed