Iceland vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Iceland
52.76 million current US$
in 2020
Saint Lucia
51.94 million current US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
130th
Saint Lucia rank
131st

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Iceland
  • Saint Lucia
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M199520072020

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 52.76 million current US$ against 51.94 million current US$ in Saint Lucia, a difference of 824,500 current US$.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Saint Lucia ahead.

Iceland ranks 130th and Saint Lucia ranks 131st of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 3 and Saint Lucia in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Saint Lucia Difference Ahead
1990s 10.98 million current US$ 0 current US$ 10.98 million current US$ Iceland
2000s 24.23 million current US$ 49.60 million current US$ 25.37 million current US$ Saint Lucia
2010s 44.71 million current US$ 5.11 million current US$ 39.61 million current US$ Iceland
2020s 52.76 million current US$ 51.94 million current US$ 824,500 current US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Iceland or Saint Lucia?
Iceland, at 52.76 million current US$ against 51.94 million current US$ in Saint Lucia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Iceland and Saint Lucia?
824,500 current US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Saint Lucia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Iceland and Saint Lucia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Iceland ranks 130th and Saint Lucia ranks 131st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/iceland/st-lucia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/iceland/st-lucia/">Iceland vs Saint Lucia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed