Iceland vs Lesotho: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Iceland
52.76 million current US$
in 2020
Lesotho
56.94 million current US$
in 2020
Iceland rank
130th
Lesotho rank
129th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Iceland
  • Lesotho
020.0M40.0M60.0M199520072020

How they compare

Lesotho currently reports 56.94 million current US$ against 52.76 million current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 4.17 million current US$.

That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Lesotho ahead.

Iceland ranks 130th and Lesotho ranks 129th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Iceland averaged higher in 2 and Lesotho in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Iceland Lesotho Difference Ahead
1990s 10.98 million current US$ 7.07 million current US$ 3.91 million current US$ Iceland
2000s 24.23 million current US$ 38.08 million current US$ 13.85 million current US$ Lesotho
2010s 44.71 million current US$ 44.04 million current US$ 674,180 current US$ Iceland
2020s 52.76 million current US$ 56.94 million current US$ 4.17 million current US$ Lesotho

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Iceland or Lesotho?
Lesotho, at 56.94 million current US$ against 52.76 million current US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Iceland and Lesotho?
4.17 million current US$, with Lesotho ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Lesotho?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Iceland and Lesotho rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Iceland ranks 130th and Lesotho ranks 129th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Iceland vs Lesotho: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 30 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/iceland/lesotho/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/iceland/lesotho/">Iceland vs Lesotho: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed