Greece vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Greece
4.55 billion current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
4.38 billion current US$
in 2020
Greece rank
33rd
Papua New Guinea rank
35th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Greece
  • Papua New Guinea
05.0B10.0B15.0B199520072020

How they compare

Greece currently reports 4.55 billion current US$ against 4.38 billion current US$ in Papua New Guinea, a difference of 177.74 million current US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Greece has been ahead every year.

Greece ranks 33rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 35th of 149 countries.

Greece has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Greece Papua New Guinea Difference Ahead
1990s 4.53 billion current US$ 2.53 billion current US$ 2.00 billion current US$ Greece
2000s 8.88 billion current US$ 1.12 billion current US$ 7.76 billion current US$ Greece
2010s 11.80 billion current US$ 1.19 billion current US$ 10.61 billion current US$ Greece
2020s 4.55 billion current US$ 4.38 billion current US$ 177.74 million current US$ Greece

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Greece or Papua New Guinea?
Greece, at 4.55 billion current US$ against 4.38 billion current US$ in Papua New Guinea as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Greece and Papua New Guinea?
177.74 million current US$, with Greece ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Greece and Papua New Guinea?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Greece and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Greece ranks 33rd and Papua New Guinea ranks 35th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Greece vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/greece/papua-new-guinea/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/greece/papua-new-guinea/">Greece vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed