Georgia vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Georgia
430.80 million current US$
in 2020
Singapore
459.15 million current US$
in 2020
Georgia rank
99th
Singapore rank
97th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Georgia
  • Singapore
01.0B2.0B3.0B199520072020

How they compare

Singapore currently reports 459.15 million current US$ against 430.80 million current US$ in Georgia, a difference of 28.35 million current US$.

That makes Singapore's figure about 1.1 times Georgia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Georgia ahead.

Georgia ranks 99th and Singapore ranks 97th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Georgia averaged higher in 3 and Singapore in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Georgia Singapore Difference Ahead
1990s 1.31 billion current US$ 0 current US$ 1.31 billion current US$ Georgia
2000s 213.05 million current US$ 0 current US$ 213.05 million current US$ Georgia
2010s 1.59 billion current US$ 41.97 million current US$ 1.55 billion current US$ Georgia
2020s 430.80 million current US$ 459.15 million current US$ 28.35 million current US$ Singapore

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Georgia or Singapore?
Singapore, at 459.15 million current US$ against 430.80 million current US$ in Georgia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Georgia and Singapore?
28.35 million current US$, with Singapore ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Georgia and Singapore?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Georgia and Singapore rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Georgia ranks 99th and Singapore ranks 97th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Georgia vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/georgia/singapore/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/georgia/singapore/">Georgia vs Singapore: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed