Gambia vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Gambia
38.96 million current US$
in 2020
Malawi
25.73 million current US$
in 2020
Gambia rank
134th
Malawi rank
136th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Gambia
  • Malawi
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Gambia currently reports 38.96 million current US$ against 25.73 million current US$ in Malawi, a difference of 13.23 million current US$.

That makes Gambia's figure about 1.5 times Malawi's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Gambia ahead.

Gambia ranks 134th and Malawi ranks 136th of 149 countries.

Gambia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gambia Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 167.32 million current US$ 22.35 million current US$ 144.97 million current US$ Gambia
2000s 112.78 million current US$ 35.29 million current US$ 77.50 million current US$ Gambia
2010s 80.65 million current US$ 29.85 million current US$ 50.80 million current US$ Gambia
2020s 38.96 million current US$ 25.73 million current US$ 13.23 million current US$ Gambia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Gambia or Malawi?
Gambia, at 38.96 million current US$ against 25.73 million current US$ in Malawi as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Gambia and Malawi?
13.23 million current US$, with Gambia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Gambia and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Gambia ranks 134th and Malawi ranks 136th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gambia vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/gambia-the/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/gambia-the/malawi/">Gambia vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed