Egypt vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Egypt
44.27 million current US$
in 2020
Iceland
52.76 million current US$
in 2020
Egypt rank
133rd
Iceland rank
130th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Egypt
  • Iceland
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M250.0M199520072020

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 52.76 million current US$ against 44.27 million current US$ in Egypt, a difference of 8.49 million current US$.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.2 times Egypt's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Egypt ahead.

Egypt ranks 133rd and Iceland ranks 130th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 3 and Iceland in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Egypt Iceland Difference Ahead
1990s 93.41 million current US$ 10.98 million current US$ 82.42 million current US$ Egypt
2000s 124.23 million current US$ 24.23 million current US$ 100.00 million current US$ Egypt
2010s 50.58 million current US$ 44.71 million current US$ 5.86 million current US$ Egypt
2020s 44.27 million current US$ 52.76 million current US$ 8.49 million current US$ Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Egypt or Iceland?
Iceland, at 52.76 million current US$ against 44.27 million current US$ in Egypt as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Egypt and Iceland?
8.49 million current US$, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Iceland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Egypt and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Egypt ranks 133rd and Iceland ranks 130th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Egypt vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 06 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/egypt-arab-rep/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/egypt-arab-rep/iceland/">Egypt vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed