Ecuador vs Pakistan: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Ecuador
518.28 million current US$
in 2020
Pakistan
562.39 million current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
95th
Pakistan rank
93rd

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Ecuador
  • Pakistan
0500.0M1.0B1.5B199520072020

How they compare

Pakistan currently reports 562.39 million current US$ against 518.28 million current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 44.11 million current US$.

That makes Pakistan's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Pakistan ahead.

Ecuador ranks 95th and Pakistan ranks 93rd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 1 and Pakistan in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Pakistan Difference Ahead
1990s 248.04 million current US$ 417.27 million current US$ 169.23 million current US$ Pakistan
2000s 384.85 million current US$ 560.63 million current US$ 175.77 million current US$ Pakistan
2010s 1.12 billion current US$ 695.08 million current US$ 428.44 million current US$ Ecuador
2020s 518.28 million current US$ 562.39 million current US$ 44.11 million current US$ Pakistan

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Ecuador or Pakistan?
Pakistan, at 562.39 million current US$ against 518.28 million current US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Ecuador and Pakistan?
44.11 million current US$, with Pakistan ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Pakistan?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Pakistan rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Ecuador ranks 95th and Pakistan ranks 93rd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Pakistan: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/ecuador/pakistan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/ecuador/pakistan/">Ecuador vs Pakistan: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed