Ecuador vs Estonia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Ecuador
518.28 million current US$
in 2020
Estonia
635.90 million current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
95th
Estonia rank
92nd

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Ecuador
  • Estonia
01.0B2.0B3.0B199520072020

How they compare

Estonia currently reports 635.90 million current US$ against 518.28 million current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 117.62 million current US$.

That makes Estonia's figure about 1.2 times Ecuador's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Estonia has been ahead every year.

Ecuador ranks 95th and Estonia ranks 92nd of 149 countries.

Estonia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador Estonia Difference Ahead
1990s 248.04 million current US$ 438.74 million current US$ 190.70 million current US$ Estonia
2000s 384.85 million current US$ 984.38 million current US$ 599.53 million current US$ Estonia
2010s 1.12 billion current US$ 1.96 billion current US$ 840.52 million current US$ Estonia
2020s 518.28 million current US$ 635.90 million current US$ 117.62 million current US$ Estonia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Ecuador or Estonia?
Estonia, at 635.90 million current US$ against 518.28 million current US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Ecuador and Estonia?
117.62 million current US$, with Estonia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Estonia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and Estonia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Ecuador ranks 95th and Estonia ranks 92nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs Estonia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/ecuador/estonia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/ecuador/estonia/">Ecuador vs Estonia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed