Croatia vs Papua New Guinea: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing
Croatia
4.14 billion current US$
in 2020
Papua New Guinea
4.38 billion current US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
36th
Papua New Guinea rank
35th
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time
- Croatia
- Papua New Guinea
How they compare
Papua New Guinea currently reports 4.38 billion current US$ against 4.14 billion current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 234.78 million current US$.
That makes Papua New Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Croatia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Croatia ahead.
Croatia ranks 36th and Papua New Guinea ranks 35th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 3 and Papua New Guinea in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Croatia | Papua New Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.36 billion current US$ | 2.53 billion current US$ | 833.04 million current US$ | Croatia |
| 2000s | 4.25 billion current US$ | 1.12 billion current US$ | 3.14 billion current US$ | Croatia |
| 2010s | 6.04 billion current US$ | 1.19 billion current US$ | 4.84 billion current US$ | Croatia |
| 2020s | 4.14 billion current US$ | 4.38 billion current US$ | 234.78 million current US$ | Papua New Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Croatia or Papua New Guinea?
- Papua New Guinea, at 4.38 billion current US$ against 4.14 billion current US$ in Croatia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Croatia and Papua New Guinea?
- 234.78 million current US$, with Papua New Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Papua New Guinea?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Croatia and Papua New Guinea rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
- Croatia ranks 36th and Papua New Guinea ranks 35th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.