China vs Germany: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

China
784.80 billion current US$
in 2020
Germany
150.63 billion current US$
in 2020
China rank
1st
Germany rank
2nd

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • China
  • Germany
0200.0B400.0B600.0B800.0B199520072020

How they compare

China currently reports 784.80 billion current US$ against 150.63 billion current US$ in Germany, a difference of 634.17 billion current US$.

That makes China's figure about 5.2 times Germany's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was China ahead.

China ranks 1st and Germany ranks 2nd of 149 countries.

China has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China Germany Difference Ahead
1990s 89.36 billion current US$ 18.18 billion current US$ 71.17 billion current US$ China
2000s 223.06 billion current US$ 27.84 billion current US$ 195.22 billion current US$ China
2010s 623.70 billion current US$ 40.06 billion current US$ 583.64 billion current US$ China
2020s 784.80 billion current US$ 150.63 billion current US$ 634.17 billion current US$ China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, China or Germany?
China, at 784.80 billion current US$ against 150.63 billion current US$ in Germany as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between China and Germany?
634.17 billion current US$, with China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China and Germany?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do China and Germany rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
China ranks 1st and Germany ranks 2nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China vs Germany: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/china/germany/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/china/germany/">China vs Germany: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed