Brazil vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Brazil
2.28 billion current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
2.05 billion current US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
56th
Guinea-Bissau rank
57th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Brazil
  • Guinea-Bissau
02.0B4.0B6.0B199520072020

How they compare

Brazil currently reports 2.28 billion current US$ against 2.05 billion current US$ in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 225.98 million current US$.

That makes Brazil's figure about 1.1 times Guinea-Bissau's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Brazil ahead.

Brazil ranks 56th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 57th of 149 countries.

Brazil has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 877.77 million current US$ 651.64 million current US$ 226.12 million current US$ Brazil
2000s 2.78 billion current US$ 850.74 million current US$ 1.93 billion current US$ Brazil
2010s 4.72 billion current US$ 630.80 million current US$ 4.09 billion current US$ Brazil
2020s 2.28 billion current US$ 2.05 billion current US$ 225.98 million current US$ Brazil

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Brazil or Guinea-Bissau?
Brazil, at 2.28 billion current US$ against 2.05 billion current US$ in Guinea-Bissau as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Brazil and Guinea-Bissau?
225.98 million current US$, with Brazil ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Brazil ranks 56th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 57th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 08 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/brazil/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/brazil/guinea-bissau/">Brazil vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed