Belarus vs Uganda: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Belarus
398.45 million current US$
in 2020
Uganda
380.81 million current US$
in 2020
Belarus rank
101st
Uganda rank
102nd

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Belarus
  • Uganda
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B199520072020

How they compare

Belarus currently reports 398.45 million current US$ against 380.81 million current US$ in Uganda, a difference of 17.64 million current US$.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Uganda ahead.

Belarus ranks 101st and Uganda ranks 102nd of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belarus averaged higher in 1 and Uganda in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belarus Uganda Difference Ahead
1990s 40.43 million current US$ 654.23 million current US$ 613.80 million current US$ Uganda
2000s 281.56 million current US$ 301.79 million current US$ 20.23 million current US$ Uganda
2010s 768.34 million current US$ 793.92 million current US$ 25.58 million current US$ Uganda
2020s 398.45 million current US$ 380.81 million current US$ 17.64 million current US$ Belarus

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Belarus or Uganda?
Belarus, at 398.45 million current US$ against 380.81 million current US$ in Uganda as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Belarus and Uganda?
17.64 million current US$, with Belarus ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belarus and Uganda?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belarus and Uganda rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Belarus ranks 101st and Uganda ranks 102nd of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belarus vs Uganda: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 28 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/belarus/uganda/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/belarus/uganda/">Belarus vs Uganda: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed