Australia vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Australia
19.29 billion current US$
in 2020
Zambia
17.97 billion current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
11th
Zambia rank
12th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Australia
  • Zambia
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B199520072020

How they compare

Australia currently reports 19.29 billion current US$ against 17.97 billion current US$ in Zambia, a difference of 1.32 billion current US$.

That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Zambia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Australia has been ahead every year.

Australia ranks 11th and Zambia ranks 12th of 149 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Zambia Difference Ahead
1990s 8.17 billion current US$ 3.57 billion current US$ 4.60 billion current US$ Australia
2000s 13.77 billion current US$ 5.33 billion current US$ 8.44 billion current US$ Australia
2010s 28.13 billion current US$ 11.49 billion current US$ 16.64 billion current US$ Australia
2020s 19.29 billion current US$ 17.97 billion current US$ 1.32 billion current US$ Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Australia or Zambia?
Australia, at 19.29 billion current US$ against 17.97 billion current US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Australia and Zambia?
1.32 billion current US$, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Zambia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Australia ranks 11th and Zambia ranks 12th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 04 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/australia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/australia/zambia/">Australia vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed