Australia vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Australia
19.29 billion current US$
in 2020
Sweden
33.83 billion current US$
in 2020
Australia rank
11th
Sweden rank
9th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Australia
  • Sweden
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B199520072020

How they compare

Sweden currently reports 33.83 billion current US$ against 19.29 billion current US$ in Australia, a difference of 14.54 billion current US$.

That makes Sweden's figure about 1.8 times Australia's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 9th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Sweden in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Sweden Difference Ahead
1990s 8.17 billion current US$ 3.37 billion current US$ 4.80 billion current US$ Australia
2000s 13.77 billion current US$ 5.93 billion current US$ 7.84 billion current US$ Australia
2010s 28.13 billion current US$ 27.93 billion current US$ 200.47 million current US$ Australia
2020s 19.29 billion current US$ 33.83 billion current US$ 14.54 billion current US$ Sweden

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Australia or Sweden?
Sweden, at 33.83 billion current US$ against 19.29 billion current US$ in Australia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Australia and Sweden?
14.54 billion current US$, with Sweden ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Sweden?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Australia and Sweden rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Australia ranks 11th and Sweden ranks 9th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/australia/sweden/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/australia/sweden/">Australia vs Sweden: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed