Angola vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Angola
13.97 million current US$
in 2020
Malawi
25.73 million current US$
in 2020
Angola rank
138th
Malawi rank
136th

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Angola
  • Malawi
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B199520072020

How they compare

Malawi currently reports 25.73 million current US$ against 13.97 million current US$ in Angola, a difference of 11.76 million current US$.

That makes Malawi's figure about 1.8 times Angola's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Angola ahead.

Angola ranks 138th and Malawi ranks 136th of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Malawi in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Malawi Difference Ahead
1990s 23.38 million current US$ 22.35 million current US$ 1.03 million current US$ Angola
2000s 113.36 million current US$ 35.29 million current US$ 78.07 million current US$ Angola
2010s 629.51 million current US$ 29.85 million current US$ 599.66 million current US$ Angola
2020s 13.97 million current US$ 25.73 million current US$ 11.76 million current US$ Malawi

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Angola or Malawi?
Malawi, at 25.73 million current US$ against 13.97 million current US$ in Angola as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Angola and Malawi?
11.76 million current US$, with Malawi ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Malawi?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Angola and Malawi rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Angola ranks 138th and Malawi ranks 136th of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/angola/malawi/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/angola/malawi/">Angola vs Malawi: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed