Angola vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing

Angola
13.97 million current US$
in 2020
Eswatini
5.37 million current US$
in 2020
Angola rank
138th
Eswatini rank
141st

Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing over time

  • Angola
  • Eswatini
0250.0M500.0M750.0M1.0B1.2B199520072020

How they compare

Angola currently reports 13.97 million current US$ against 5.37 million current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 8.60 million current US$.

That makes Angola's figure about 2.6 times Eswatini's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Eswatini ahead.

Angola ranks 138th and Eswatini ranks 141st of 149 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Angola averaged higher in 3 and Eswatini in 1.

Head to head by decade

Decade Angola Eswatini Difference Ahead
1990s 23.38 million current US$ 30.29 million current US$ 6.91 million current US$ Eswatini
2000s 113.36 million current US$ 35.89 million current US$ 77.47 million current US$ Angola
2010s 629.51 million current US$ 13.36 million current US$ 616.15 million current US$ Angola
2020s 13.97 million current US$ 5.37 million current US$ 8.60 million current US$ Angola

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing, Angola or Eswatini?
Angola, at 13.97 million current US$ against 5.37 million current US$ in Eswatini as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing between Angola and Eswatini?
8.60 million current US$, with Angola ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and Eswatini?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Angola and Eswatini rank globally for renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing?
Angola ranks 138th and Eswatini ranks 141st of 149 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Angola vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing. Statizoid. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/angola/eswatini/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-forest-recreation-hunting-and-fishing-services-current-us/angola/eswatini/">Angola vs Eswatini: Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, forest recreation, hunting and fishing services (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
149 places, 3,833 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed