South Africa vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital, fisheries

South Africa
530.70 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Tunisia
522.26 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
South Africa rank
52nd
Tunisia rank
53rd

Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time

  • South Africa
  • Tunisia
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 530.70 million real chained 2019 US$ against 522.26 million real chained 2019 US$ in Tunisia, a difference of 8.44 million real chained 2019 US$.

Across all 26 years both countries report, South Africa has been ahead every year.

South Africa ranks 52nd and Tunisia ranks 53rd of 151 countries.

South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade South Africa Tunisia Difference Ahead
1990s 698.98 million real chained 2019 US$ 660.43 million real chained 2019 US$ 38.55 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2000s 638.51 million real chained 2019 US$ 583.19 million real chained 2019 US$ 55.32 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2010s 565.70 million real chained 2019 US$ 538.78 million real chained 2019 US$ 26.92 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa
2020s 530.70 million real chained 2019 US$ 522.26 million real chained 2019 US$ 8.44 million real chained 2019 US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, South Africa or Tunisia?
South Africa, at 530.70 million real chained 2019 US$ against 522.26 million real chained 2019 US$ in Tunisia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between South Africa and Tunisia?
8.44 million real chained 2019 US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Tunisia?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do South Africa and Tunisia rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
South Africa ranks 52nd and Tunisia ranks 53rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

South Africa vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/south-africa/tunisia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/south-africa/tunisia/">South Africa vs Tunisia: Renewable natural capital, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.