Malta vs Ukraine: Renewable natural capital, fisheries

Malta
194.00 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Ukraine
155.81 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malta rank
73rd
Ukraine rank
76th

Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time

  • Malta
  • Ukraine
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Malta currently reports 194.00 million real chained 2019 US$ against 155.81 million real chained 2019 US$ in Ukraine, a difference of 38.19 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.2 times Ukraine's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Malta ranks 73rd and Ukraine ranks 76th of 151 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Malta Ukraine Difference Ahead
1990s 254.53 million real chained 2019 US$ 238.91 million real chained 2019 US$ 15.62 million real chained 2019 US$ Malta
2000s 225.78 million real chained 2019 US$ 211.54 million real chained 2019 US$ 14.24 million real chained 2019 US$ Malta
2010s 207.05 million real chained 2019 US$ 179.36 million real chained 2019 US$ 27.69 million real chained 2019 US$ Malta
2020s 194.00 million real chained 2019 US$ 155.81 million real chained 2019 US$ 38.19 million real chained 2019 US$ Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Malta or Ukraine?
Malta, at 194.00 million real chained 2019 US$ against 155.81 million real chained 2019 US$ in Ukraine as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Malta and Ukraine?
38.19 million real chained 2019 US$, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Malta and Ukraine?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Malta and Ukraine rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
Malta ranks 73rd and Ukraine ranks 76th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Malta vs Ukraine: Renewable natural capital, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/malta/ukraine/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/malta/ukraine/">Malta vs Ukraine: Renewable natural capital, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.