Latvia vs Malta: Renewable natural capital, fisheries

Latvia
170.35 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Malta
194.00 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Latvia rank
75th
Malta rank
73rd

Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time

  • Latvia
  • Malta
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Malta currently reports 194.00 million real chained 2019 US$ against 170.35 million real chained 2019 US$ in Latvia, a difference of 23.65 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Malta's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Malta has been ahead every year.

Latvia ranks 75th and Malta ranks 73rd of 151 countries.

Malta has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Latvia Malta Difference Ahead
1990s 215.19 million real chained 2019 US$ 254.53 million real chained 2019 US$ 39.34 million real chained 2019 US$ Malta
2000s 194.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 225.78 million real chained 2019 US$ 31.25 million real chained 2019 US$ Malta
2010s 180.68 million real chained 2019 US$ 207.05 million real chained 2019 US$ 26.37 million real chained 2019 US$ Malta
2020s 170.35 million real chained 2019 US$ 194.00 million real chained 2019 US$ 23.65 million real chained 2019 US$ Malta

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Latvia or Malta?
Malta, at 194.00 million real chained 2019 US$ against 170.35 million real chained 2019 US$ in Latvia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Latvia and Malta?
23.65 million real chained 2019 US$, with Malta ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Malta?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Latvia and Malta rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
Latvia ranks 75th and Malta ranks 73rd of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Latvia vs Malta: Renewable natural capital, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 23 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/latvia/malta/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/latvia/malta/">Latvia vs Malta: Renewable natural capital, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.