Gabon vs Lithuania: Renewable natural capital, fisheries

Gabon
74.48 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Lithuania
67.52 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Gabon rank
86th
Lithuania rank
88th

Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time

  • Gabon
  • Lithuania
020.0M40.0M60.0M80.0M100.0M199520072020

How they compare

Gabon currently reports 74.48 million real chained 2019 US$ against 67.52 million real chained 2019 US$ in Lithuania, a difference of 6.96 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Gabon's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Gabon has been ahead every year.

Gabon ranks 86th and Lithuania ranks 88th of 151 countries.

Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Gabon Lithuania Difference Ahead
1990s 97.59 million real chained 2019 US$ 85.29 million real chained 2019 US$ 12.30 million real chained 2019 US$ Gabon
2000s 87.15 million real chained 2019 US$ 77.10 million real chained 2019 US$ 10.05 million real chained 2019 US$ Gabon
2010s 77.74 million real chained 2019 US$ 71.61 million real chained 2019 US$ 6.12 million real chained 2019 US$ Gabon
2020s 74.48 million real chained 2019 US$ 67.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 6.96 million real chained 2019 US$ Gabon

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Gabon or Lithuania?
Gabon, at 74.48 million real chained 2019 US$ against 67.52 million real chained 2019 US$ in Lithuania as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Gabon and Lithuania?
6.96 million real chained 2019 US$, with Gabon ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Gabon and Lithuania?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Gabon and Lithuania rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
Gabon ranks 86th and Lithuania ranks 88th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Gabon vs Lithuania: Renewable natural capital, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 19 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/gabon/lithuania/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/gabon/lithuania/">Gabon vs Lithuania: Renewable natural capital, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.