El Salvador vs Finland: Renewable natural capital, fisheries

El Salvador
141.32 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Finland
131.49 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
El Salvador rank
79th
Finland rank
80th

Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time

  • El Salvador
  • Finland
050.0M100.0M150.0M200.0M199520072020

How they compare

El Salvador currently reports 141.32 million real chained 2019 US$ against 131.49 million real chained 2019 US$ in Finland, a difference of 9.82 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes El Salvador's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was El Salvador ahead.

El Salvador ranks 79th and Finland ranks 80th of 151 countries.

El Salvador has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade El Salvador Finland Difference Ahead
1990s 186.83 million real chained 2019 US$ 166.11 million real chained 2019 US$ 20.72 million real chained 2019 US$ El Salvador
2000s 171.18 million real chained 2019 US$ 150.15 million real chained 2019 US$ 21.03 million real chained 2019 US$ El Salvador
2010s 142.86 million real chained 2019 US$ 139.47 million real chained 2019 US$ 3.39 million real chained 2019 US$ El Salvador
2020s 141.32 million real chained 2019 US$ 131.49 million real chained 2019 US$ 9.82 million real chained 2019 US$ El Salvador

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, El Salvador or Finland?
El Salvador, at 141.32 million real chained 2019 US$ against 131.49 million real chained 2019 US$ in Finland as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between El Salvador and Finland?
9.82 million real chained 2019 US$, with El Salvador ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for El Salvador and Finland?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do El Salvador and Finland rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
El Salvador ranks 79th and Finland ranks 80th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

El Salvador vs Finland: Renewable natural capital, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/el-salvador/finland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/el-salvador/finland/">El Salvador vs Finland: Renewable natural capital, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.