Cambodia vs Portugal: Renewable natural capital, fisheries

Cambodia
695.97 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Portugal
783.35 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Cambodia rank
42nd
Portugal rank
39th

Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time

  • Cambodia
  • Portugal
0200.0M400.0M600.0M800.0M1.0B199520072020

How they compare

Portugal currently reports 783.35 million real chained 2019 US$ against 695.97 million real chained 2019 US$ in Cambodia, a difference of 87.38 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Portugal's figure about 1.1 times Cambodia's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Cambodia ahead.

Cambodia ranks 42nd and Portugal ranks 39th of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Cambodia averaged higher in 1 and Portugal in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cambodia Portugal Difference Ahead
1990s 940.52 million real chained 2019 US$ 921.94 million real chained 2019 US$ 18.58 million real chained 2019 US$ Cambodia
2000s 830.05 million real chained 2019 US$ 886.73 million real chained 2019 US$ 56.68 million real chained 2019 US$ Portugal
2010s 735.72 million real chained 2019 US$ 856.64 million real chained 2019 US$ 120.92 million real chained 2019 US$ Portugal
2020s 695.97 million real chained 2019 US$ 783.35 million real chained 2019 US$ 87.38 million real chained 2019 US$ Portugal

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Cambodia or Portugal?
Portugal, at 783.35 million real chained 2019 US$ against 695.97 million real chained 2019 US$ in Cambodia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Cambodia and Portugal?
87.38 million real chained 2019 US$, with Portugal ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cambodia and Portugal?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Cambodia and Portugal rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
Cambodia ranks 42nd and Portugal ranks 39th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cambodia vs Portugal: Renewable natural capital, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/cambodia/portugal/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/cambodia/portugal/">Cambodia vs Portugal: Renewable natural capital, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.