Brazil vs Italy: Renewable natural capital, fisheries

Brazil
1.57 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Italy
2.09 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Brazil rank
31st
Italy rank
28th

Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time

  • Brazil
  • Italy
01.0B2.0B3.0B199520072020

How they compare

Italy currently reports 2.09 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 1.57 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil, a difference of 523.58 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Italy's figure about 1.3 times Brazil's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Italy has been ahead every year.

Brazil ranks 31st and Italy ranks 28th of 151 countries.

Italy has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Brazil Italy Difference Ahead
1990s 1.64 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.65 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.01 billion real chained 2019 US$ Italy
2000s 1.72 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.34 billion real chained 2019 US$ 617.00 million real chained 2019 US$ Italy
2010s 1.64 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.16 billion real chained 2019 US$ 525.65 million real chained 2019 US$ Italy
2020s 1.57 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.09 billion real chained 2019 US$ 523.58 million real chained 2019 US$ Italy

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Brazil or Italy?
Italy, at 2.09 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 1.57 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Brazil as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Brazil and Italy?
523.58 million real chained 2019 US$, with Italy ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Brazil and Italy?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Brazil and Italy rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
Brazil ranks 31st and Italy ranks 28th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Brazil vs Italy: Renewable natural capital, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 29 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/italy/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/brazil/italy/">Brazil vs Italy: Renewable natural capital, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.