Belgium vs Congo: Renewable natural capital, fisheries

Belgium
280.83 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Congo
241.37 million real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
69th
Congo rank
71st

Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time

  • Belgium
  • Congo
0100.0M200.0M300.0M199520072020

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 280.83 million real chained 2019 US$ against 241.37 million real chained 2019 US$ in Congo, a difference of 39.46 million real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Belgium's figure about 1.2 times Congo's.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Congo ahead.

Belgium ranks 69th and Congo ranks 71st of 151 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Belgium averaged higher in 1 and Congo in 3.

Head to head by decade

Decade Belgium Congo Difference Ahead
1990s 245.66 million real chained 2019 US$ 300.95 million real chained 2019 US$ 55.29 million real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2000s 224.31 million real chained 2019 US$ 273.14 million real chained 2019 US$ 48.82 million real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2010s 247.57 million real chained 2019 US$ 250.79 million real chained 2019 US$ 3.21 million real chained 2019 US$ Congo
2020s 280.83 million real chained 2019 US$ 241.37 million real chained 2019 US$ 39.46 million real chained 2019 US$ Belgium

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Belgium or Congo?
Belgium, at 280.83 million real chained 2019 US$ against 241.37 million real chained 2019 US$ in Congo as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Belgium and Congo?
39.46 million real chained 2019 US$, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Congo?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Belgium and Congo rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
Belgium ranks 69th and Congo ranks 71st of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Belgium vs Congo: Renewable natural capital, fisheries. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 20 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/belgium/congo-rep/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-real-chained-2019-us/belgium/congo-rep/">Belgium vs Congo: Renewable natural capital, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, fisheries (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.