Romania vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital, fisheries
Romania
5.12 million current US$
in 2020
Sudan
6.40 million current US$
in 2020
Romania rank
109th
Sudan rank
107th
Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time
- Romania
- Sudan
How they compare
Sudan currently reports 6.40 million current US$ against 5.12 million current US$ in Romania, a difference of 1.28 million current US$.
That makes Sudan's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was Sudan ahead.
Romania ranks 109th and Sudan ranks 107th of 149 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Romania averaged higher in 1 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Romania | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 6.40 million current US$ | 2.83 million current US$ | 3.57 million current US$ | Romania |
| 2020s | 5.12 million current US$ | 6.40 million current US$ | 1.28 million current US$ | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Romania or Sudan?
- Sudan, at 6.40 million current US$ against 5.12 million current US$ in Romania as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Romania and Sudan?
- 1.28 million current US$, with Sudan ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Romania and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do Romania and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
- Romania ranks 109th and Sudan ranks 107th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.