Ecuador vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, fisheries

Ecuador
550.59 million current US$
in 2020
South Africa
587.51 million current US$
in 2020
Ecuador rank
49th
South Africa rank
48th

Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time

  • Ecuador
  • South Africa
02.0B4.0B6.0B199520072020

How they compare

South Africa currently reports 587.51 million current US$ against 550.59 million current US$ in Ecuador, a difference of 36.92 million current US$.

That makes South Africa's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.

The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was South Africa ahead.

Ecuador ranks 49th and South Africa ranks 48th of 150 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Ecuador averaged higher in 2 and South Africa in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Ecuador South Africa Difference Ahead
1990s 1.14 billion current US$ 3.59 billion current US$ 2.45 billion current US$ South Africa
2000s 3.66 billion current US$ 2.83 billion current US$ 821.94 million current US$ Ecuador
2010s 619.49 million current US$ 401.43 million current US$ 218.06 million current US$ Ecuador
2020s 550.59 million current US$ 587.51 million current US$ 36.92 million current US$ South Africa

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Ecuador or South Africa?
South Africa, at 587.51 million current US$ against 550.59 million current US$ in Ecuador as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Ecuador and South Africa?
36.92 million current US$, with South Africa ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and South Africa?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Ecuador and South Africa rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
Ecuador ranks 49th and South Africa ranks 48th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Ecuador vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, fisheries. Statizoid. Retrieved 25 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-current-us/ecuador/south-africa/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-current-us/ecuador/south-africa/">Ecuador vs South Africa: Renewable natural capital, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, fisheries (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
150 places, 3,859 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed