Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, fisheries

Croatia
111.14 million current US$
in 2020
Guinea-Bissau
130.28 million current US$
in 2020
Croatia rank
81st
Guinea-Bissau rank
78th

Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time

  • Croatia
  • Guinea-Bissau
0100.0M200.0M300.0M400.0M500.0M199520072020

How they compare

Guinea-Bissau currently reports 130.28 million current US$ against 111.14 million current US$ in Croatia, a difference of 19.14 million current US$.

That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.2 times Croatia's.

The two have swapped places 4 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.

Croatia ranks 81st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 78th of 150 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Croatia averaged higher in 2 and Guinea-Bissau in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Croatia Guinea-Bissau Difference Ahead
1990s 54.23 million current US$ 120.78 million current US$ 66.55 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau
2000s 267.97 million current US$ 198.06 million current US$ 69.91 million current US$ Croatia
2010s 197.17 million current US$ 122.72 million current US$ 74.45 million current US$ Croatia
2020s 111.14 million current US$ 130.28 million current US$ 19.14 million current US$ Guinea-Bissau

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Croatia or Guinea-Bissau?
Guinea-Bissau, at 130.28 million current US$ against 111.14 million current US$ in Croatia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
19.14 million current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Croatia and Guinea-Bissau?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Croatia and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
Croatia ranks 81st and Guinea-Bissau ranks 78th of 150 countries.
Where does this data come from?
The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, fisheries. Statizoid. Retrieved 22 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-current-us/croatia/guinea-bissau/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-fisheries-current-us/croatia/guinea-bissau/">Croatia vs Guinea-Bissau: Renewable natural capital, fisheries</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, fisheries (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
World Bank
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
150 places, 3,859 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed