Congo vs Malta: Renewable natural capital, fisheries
Congo
251.74 million current US$
in 2020
Malta
231.92 million current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
72nd
Malta rank
73rd
Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time
- Congo
- Malta
How they compare
Congo currently reports 251.74 million current US$ against 231.92 million current US$ in Malta, a difference of 19.82 million current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.1 times Malta's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Malta ahead.
Congo ranks 72nd and Malta ranks 73rd of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Malta in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Malta | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 58.85 million current US$ | 58.85 million current US$ | Malta |
| 2000s | 79.73 million current US$ | 387.27 million current US$ | 307.54 million current US$ | Malta |
| 2010s | 172.93 million current US$ | 69.04 million current US$ | 103.88 million current US$ | Congo |
| 2020s | 251.74 million current US$ | 231.92 million current US$ | 19.82 million current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Congo or Malta?
- Congo, at 251.74 million current US$ against 231.92 million current US$ in Malta as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Congo and Malta?
- 19.82 million current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Malta?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Malta rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
- Congo ranks 72nd and Malta ranks 73rd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.