Congo vs Latvia: Renewable natural capital, fisheries
Congo
251.74 million current US$
in 2020
Latvia
194.70 million current US$
in 2020
Congo rank
72nd
Latvia rank
74th
Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time
- Congo
- Latvia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 251.74 million current US$ against 194.70 million current US$ in Latvia, a difference of 57.04 million current US$.
That makes Congo's figure about 1.3 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Latvia ahead.
Congo ranks 72nd and Latvia ranks 74th of 149 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 0 current US$ | 173.77 million current US$ | 173.77 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2000s | 79.73 million current US$ | 1.67 billion current US$ | 1.59 billion current US$ | Latvia |
| 2010s | 172.93 million current US$ | 1.04 billion current US$ | 863.10 million current US$ | Latvia |
| 2020s | 251.74 million current US$ | 194.70 million current US$ | 57.04 million current US$ | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Congo or Latvia?
- Congo, at 251.74 million current US$ against 194.70 million current US$ in Latvia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Congo and Latvia?
- 57.04 million current US$, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latvia?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Congo and Latvia rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
- Congo ranks 72nd and Latvia ranks 74th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.