Chile vs Iceland: Renewable natural capital, fisheries
Chile
3.35 billion current US$
in 2020
Iceland
3.09 billion current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
17th
Iceland rank
20th
Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time
- Chile
- Iceland
How they compare
Chile currently reports 3.35 billion current US$ against 3.09 billion current US$ in Iceland, a difference of 258.72 million current US$.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Iceland's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 17th and Iceland ranks 20th of 149 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Iceland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.15 billion current US$ | 2.59 billion current US$ | 2.56 billion current US$ | Chile |
| 2000s | 11.26 billion current US$ | 3.64 billion current US$ | 7.62 billion current US$ | Chile |
| 2010s | 5.72 billion current US$ | 3.55 billion current US$ | 2.17 billion current US$ | Chile |
| 2020s | 3.35 billion current US$ | 3.09 billion current US$ | 258.72 million current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Chile or Iceland?
- Chile, at 3.35 billion current US$ against 3.09 billion current US$ in Iceland as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Chile and Iceland?
- 258.72 million current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Iceland?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Iceland rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
- Chile ranks 17th and Iceland ranks 20th of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.