Belgium vs Congo: Renewable natural capital, fisheries
Belgium
258.95 million current US$
in 2020
Congo
251.74 million current US$
in 2020
Belgium rank
70th
Congo rank
72nd
Renewable natural capital, fisheries over time
- Belgium
- Congo
How they compare
Belgium currently reports 258.95 million current US$ against 251.74 million current US$ in Congo, a difference of 7.21 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Belgium ahead.
Belgium ranks 70th and Congo ranks 72nd of 149 countries.
Belgium has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Belgium | Congo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 182.70 million current US$ | 0 current US$ | 182.70 million current US$ | Belgium |
| 2000s | 207.78 million current US$ | 79.73 million current US$ | 128.06 million current US$ | Belgium |
| 2010s | 223.66 million current US$ | 172.93 million current US$ | 50.74 million current US$ | Belgium |
| 2020s | 258.95 million current US$ | 251.74 million current US$ | 7.21 million current US$ | Belgium |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, fisheries, Belgium or Congo?
- Belgium, at 258.95 million current US$ against 251.74 million current US$ in Congo as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, fisheries between Belgium and Congo?
- 7.21 million current US$, with Belgium ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Belgium and Congo?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
- How do Belgium and Congo rank globally for renewable natural capital, fisheries?
- Belgium ranks 70th and Congo ranks 72nd of 149 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, fisheries (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.