Tajikistan vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land

Tajikistan
21.48 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zimbabwe
23.79 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Tajikistan rank
87th
Zimbabwe rank
84th

Renewable natural capital, agricultural land over time

  • Tajikistan
  • Zimbabwe
05.0B10.0B15.0B20.0B25.0B199520072020

How they compare

Zimbabwe currently reports 23.79 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 21.48 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Tajikistan, a difference of 2.31 billion real chained 2019 US$.

That makes Zimbabwe's figure about 1.1 times Tajikistan's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Zimbabwe has been ahead every year.

Tajikistan ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 151 countries.

Zimbabwe has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Tajikistan Zimbabwe Difference Ahead
1990s 19.96 billion real chained 2019 US$ 21.11 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.15 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2000s 20.35 billion real chained 2019 US$ 23.31 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.96 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2010s 21.11 billion real chained 2019 US$ 23.82 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.71 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe
2020s 21.48 billion real chained 2019 US$ 23.79 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.31 billion real chained 2019 US$ Zimbabwe

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, agricultural land, Tajikistan or Zimbabwe?
Zimbabwe, at 23.79 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 21.48 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Tajikistan as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, agricultural land between Tajikistan and Zimbabwe?
2.31 billion real chained 2019 US$, with Zimbabwe ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Tajikistan and Zimbabwe?
26 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2020.
How do Tajikistan and Zimbabwe rank globally for renewable natural capital, agricultural land?
Tajikistan ranks 87th and Zimbabwe ranks 84th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Tajikistan vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/tajikistan/zimbabwe/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/tajikistan/zimbabwe/">Tajikistan vs Zimbabwe: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.