Serbia vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land

Serbia
45.33 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Zambia
45.05 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia rank
67th
Zambia rank
69th

Renewable natural capital, agricultural land over time

  • Serbia
  • Zambia
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 45.33 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 45.05 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia, a difference of 280.70 million real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 6 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.

Serbia ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 69th of 151 countries.

Serbia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Serbia Zambia Difference Ahead
2000s 46.12 billion real chained 2019 US$ 43.89 billion real chained 2019 US$ 2.23 billion real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 45.09 billion real chained 2019 US$ 44.92 billion real chained 2019 US$ 172.33 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2020s 45.33 billion real chained 2019 US$ 45.05 billion real chained 2019 US$ 280.70 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, agricultural land, Serbia or Zambia?
Serbia, at 45.33 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 45.05 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Zambia as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, agricultural land between Serbia and Zambia?
280.70 million real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Serbia and Zambia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Serbia and Zambia rank globally for renewable natural capital, agricultural land?
Serbia ranks 67th and Zambia ranks 69th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Serbia vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 01 September 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/zambia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/serbia/zambia/">Serbia vs Zambia: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.