Peru vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land

Peru
44.89 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Serbia
45.33 billion real chained 2019 US$
in 2020
Peru rank
70th
Serbia rank
67th

Renewable natural capital, agricultural land over time

  • Peru
  • Serbia
010.0B20.0B30.0B40.0B50.0B199520072020

How they compare

Serbia currently reports 45.33 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 44.89 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Peru, a difference of 445.40 million real chained 2019 US$.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.

Peru ranks 70th and Serbia ranks 67th of 151 countries.

Across the 3 decades both report, Peru averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Peru Serbia Difference Ahead
2000s 44.88 billion real chained 2019 US$ 46.12 billion real chained 2019 US$ 1.24 billion real chained 2019 US$ Serbia
2010s 45.39 billion real chained 2019 US$ 45.09 billion real chained 2019 US$ 292.02 million real chained 2019 US$ Peru
2020s 44.89 billion real chained 2019 US$ 45.33 billion real chained 2019 US$ 445.40 million real chained 2019 US$ Serbia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher renewable natural capital, agricultural land, Peru or Serbia?
Serbia, at 45.33 billion real chained 2019 US$ against 44.89 billion real chained 2019 US$ in Peru as of 2020.
What is the difference in renewable natural capital, agricultural land between Peru and Serbia?
445.40 million real chained 2019 US$, with Serbia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Peru and Serbia?
14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
How do Peru and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital, agricultural land?
Peru ranks 70th and Serbia ranks 67th of 151 countries.
Where does this data come from?
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4, published as Renewable natural capital, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Peru vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land. Statizoid, drawing on World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4. Retrieved 26 August 2026, from https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/peru/serbia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://reference.statizoid.com/compare/renewable-natural-capital-agricultural-land-real-chained-2019-us/peru/serbia/">Peru vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Renewable natural capital, agricultural land (real chained 2019 US$)
Unit
real chained 2019 US$
Source
World Bank. 2021. The Changing Wealth of Nations 2021: Managing Assets for the Future. Washington, DC: World Bank. doi:10.1596/978-1-4648-1590-4
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
151 places, 3,885 data points, 1995–2020
Last refreshed

Natural capital includes the valuation of renewable and nonrenewable natural capital. Renewable natural capital includes agricultural land (cropland and pastureland), forests (timber, and three ecosystem services: water, recretion and non-wood forest products), protected areas, mangroves and fisheries. Nonrenewable natural capital includes fossil fuel energy (oil, gas, hard and soft coal) and minerals (bauxite, copper, gold, iron ore, lead, nickel, phosphate, silver, tin, and zinc),Values are measured at market exchange rates in constant 2018 US dollars, using a country-specific GDP deflator.