South Africa vs Sudan: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland
South Africa
100.63 billion current US$
in 2020
Sudan
99.89 billion current US$
in 2020
South Africa rank
24th
Sudan rank
25th
Renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland over time
- South Africa
- Sudan
How they compare
South Africa currently reports 100.63 billion current US$ against 99.89 billion current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 740.20 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2012 it was South Africa ahead.
South Africa ranks 24th and Sudan ranks 25th of 151 countries.
South Africa has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | South Africa | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 99.37 billion current US$ | 85.12 billion current US$ | 14.24 billion current US$ | South Africa |
| 2020s | 100.63 billion current US$ | 99.89 billion current US$ | 740.20 million current US$ | South Africa |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland, South Africa or Sudan?
- South Africa, at 100.63 billion current US$ against 99.89 billion current US$ in Sudan as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland between South Africa and Sudan?
- 740.20 million current US$, with South Africa ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for South Africa and Sudan?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2012 to 2020.
- How do South Africa and Sudan rank globally for renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland?
- South Africa ranks 24th and Sudan ranks 25th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.