Chile vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland
Chile
27.21 billion current US$
in 2020
Serbia
27.14 billion current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
64th
Serbia rank
65th
Renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 27.21 billion current US$ against 27.14 billion current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 75.80 million current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Chile ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 65th of 151 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 11.16 billion current US$ | 23.99 billion current US$ | 12.82 billion current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 22.29 billion current US$ | 24.47 billion current US$ | 2.18 billion current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 27.21 billion current US$ | 27.14 billion current US$ | 75.80 million current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland, Chile or Serbia?
- Chile, at 27.21 billion current US$ against 27.14 billion current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland between Chile and Serbia?
- 75.80 million current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland?
- Chile ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 65th of 151 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, agricultural land: pastureland (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.