Chile vs Serbia: Renewable natural capital, agricultural land
Chile
52.65 billion current US$
in 2020
Serbia
51.33 billion current US$
in 2020
Chile rank
64th
Serbia rank
65th
Renewable natural capital, agricultural land over time
- Chile
- Serbia
How they compare
Chile currently reports 52.65 billion current US$ against 51.33 billion current US$ in Serbia, a difference of 1.32 billion current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 14 shared years of data; in 2007 it was Serbia ahead.
Chile ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 65th of 150 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 1 and Serbia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Serbia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2000s | 20.53 billion current US$ | 44.61 billion current US$ | 24.07 billion current US$ | Serbia |
| 2010s | 42.80 billion current US$ | 45.86 billion current US$ | 3.06 billion current US$ | Serbia |
| 2020s | 52.65 billion current US$ | 51.33 billion current US$ | 1.32 billion current US$ | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher renewable natural capital, agricultural land, Chile or Serbia?
- Chile, at 52.65 billion current US$ against 51.33 billion current US$ in Serbia as of 2020.
- What is the difference in renewable natural capital, agricultural land between Chile and Serbia?
- 1.32 billion current US$, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Serbia?
- 14 years are reported by both, from 2007 to 2020.
- How do Chile and Serbia rank globally for renewable natural capital, agricultural land?
- Chile ranks 64th and Serbia ranks 65th of 150 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Renewable natural capital, agricultural land (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.