Jordan vs Oman: Remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted
Jordan
4.1%
in 2025
Oman
4.2%
in 2025
Jordan rank
41st
Oman rank
39th
Remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted over time
- Jordan
- Oman
How they compare
Oman currently reports 4.2% against 4.1% in Jordan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 9 shared years of data; in 2017 it was Jordan ahead.
Jordan ranks 41st and Oman ranks 39th of 47 countries.
Jordan has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Jordan | Oman | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010s | 4.2% | 4.1% | 0.1% | Jordan |
| 2020s | 6.7% | 4.2% | 2.5% | Jordan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted, Jordan or Oman?
- Oman, at 4.2% against 4.1% in Jordan as of 2025.
- What is the difference in remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted between Jordan and Oman?
- 0.1%, with Oman ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Jordan and Oman?
- 9 years are reported by both, from 2017 to 2025.
- How do Jordan and Oman rank globally for remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted?
- Jordan ranks 41st and Oman ranks 39th of 47 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- World Bank – processed by Our World in Data, published as Remittance costs as a proportion of the amount remitted. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Average remittance costs of sending $200 for a sending country as a proportion of the amount remitted (%).